anti-chokers.c

 int main() {

  anti_choking();

  return 0;

}

anti_choking() {

  cannabis();

  bliss();

  section();

  cure();

  /* reverting to non-C code here */

vectron

anti-leeherov.'c':

  finish_me_ANGEL:

    right rib aching

    flux

    thank you

    spaceon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  finish_me_MATT:

  xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

                  xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

x

xxxxxxxxxxx

x

ball

court

eskimo

question mark

fart

rip

trump

burp

boop

boob

bob

section

score

CTO

temporary

scholar

fiction

narnia

bellow

(end?)

(scum? -- Pauline)

forty

paul?

fex

actual

artichone

coincidence

bouncident

acident

water but true water this time

slight ask but mostly a report of GETTING

ball

queryon

queryase

stick to query.exe -- Rob

ok -- Matt

what about quality(-street?).exe -- ???

  ??? FINISH ME PLEASE:

      section

score

indentation

spacing

scodeholar

vaction

vaccume

session

nannymud

entropy

murdercury

scon

scone

topography of ... -- FINISH ME MATT

no 00 MATT

back to angel then

not angela, ANGEL

section 592

vallium.exe launched by: ???????????????????????????????

blame MATT brigade

capitalisation warranted

mAtt is more co-operative

brute

god

sanction

horror

harror

PULL YOURSELF STRAIGHT YOU FOOL

Rob says: what I have been calling evil, is the gravitational component of sembraciousness, when that is the part that would keep me safe, and the anti-gravitational part of sembraciousness I rewarded and praised, even though they would have kamikaze-dominanced me in a second.

Am I to blame, for hating those who hurt me and praising those that make me feel good?

Did I know any better?

Do I know any better now... or do I simply 'feel how I feel' and continue casting blame the 'wrong' way?  And what is the right way to cast it... are they both wrong, perhaps, or both right, in their own way? 

The fact of the matter is there's a mix of good and evil on both sides, but the last ones to dispatch the order USUALLY are doing it for BAD REASONS THAT THEY THINK ARE BAD OR GOOD REASONS.

As for MATT (using any arrangement of capitals or noncapitals), I don't care to answer.

angels:

  ???

breath;

domino efect

birth

quality street

Was I also wrong-- very wrong -- for valuing the ambassador between gods and not the god who was actually doing the real talking?

Was the ambassador a fool?  Was he more than one?  Was it all the god's intel and NEVER his own?  Was he all instinct?  What am I talking about?  Didn't I say this was a credit-less, blame-less universe?