miscommunications = conmunications
interpreting 'eat, robert' as 'eat robert' and possibly vice versa (amazing what a comma can do)
the other one, forgot it, edit in later
another important distinction
metaphysical to physical magnitude. The number of nodes or nodes of a particular type per grape for example. this whole issue arose from the 'it's just a pretext' (i.e. the grape is small and can't be that impactful on the body) leading to a ???forgot but it wasn't plausibility but that might do, challenge. Any paradigm you like. You could even ask how much 'force' the grape has from Star Wars.! So, does this mean to say that saying 'it's just a pretext' is right or wrong? I guess it depends on what it connotes! Speaking of my metaphysics; is everything 'just a pretext'? I said the fundamentals that move units are pretexts and fear. Is that right? Why or why not? Maybe I should leave this alone, not challenge it, or come back to it later. (pretext/fear)(on/off) I guess I hae no difficulty thinking THAT it is pretexts and fear... it feels right. But I can't say WHY I think it. Is that important? How much of an ANTI-pretext is ...
Comments
Post a Comment