see body

 an algorithm for setting the standard for proper association and improper association, where improper is off-topic and what is the standard of off-topic?  Something to do with a main function perhaps?  And the brain says 'this no longer falls under that heading, even though I can see how you formed a pathway to the off-topic domain'.  However that's not an algorithm, that's not computer code.


Maybe do this later or have someone else do it.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

another important distinction

metaphysical to physical magnitude.  The number of nodes or nodes of a particular type per grape for example. this whole issue arose from the 'it's just a pretext' (i.e. the grape is small and can't be that impactful on the body) leading to a ???forgot but it wasn't plausibility but that might do, challenge. Any paradigm you like.  You could even ask how much 'force' the grape has from Star Wars.! So, does this mean to say that saying 'it's just a pretext' is right or wrong?  I guess it depends on what it connotes! Speaking of my metaphysics; is everything 'just a pretext'?  I said the fundamentals that move units are pretexts and fear.  Is that right?  Why or why not?  Maybe I should leave this alone, not challenge it, or come back to it later. (pretext/fear)(on/off) I guess I hae no difficulty thinking THAT it is pretexts and fear... it feels right.  But I can't say WHY I think it.  Is that important? How much of an ANTI-pretext is ...
Read more

re(organise?)

re-something, but organise is best word I can think of guess what brain: most self-preserving organ? sex organs: most reward/punishment influenced/receptive? phase out these truths!  dynamic!
Read more